注意
本文最后更新于 2024-07-21,文中内容可能已过时。
CS144 课程 Lab Assignment 中的 Checkpoint 0: networking warmup
官方给出了四种环境方式,由于我本机就是 Arch Linux。第一个 lab 我是用的自己的本机做的。我安装了一个 Debian 12 的虚拟机,我准备用那个虚拟机做后续需要用到虚拟机的 lab。
也比较简单,装完后执行以下下述命令装一些必要的软件即可:
1
| $ sudo apt update && sudo apt install git cmake gdb build-essential clang clang-tidy clang-format pkg-config glibc-doc tcpdump tshark clangd
|
我这里去掉了 gcc-doc
,因为我虚拟机装 Debian 的时候提示没有这个软件包,而且我也没认识到特地本机装 GCC
的文档的意义何在,我还加了 clangd
,因为我习惯用 clangd
了。
Networking by hand
telnet
过去之后最好把 GET /hello HTTP/1.1
这些直接粘贴过去,自己手敲容易超时导致断开连接。
我只尝试了 telnet cs144.keithw.org http
In this lab, you will simply use the operating system’s pre-existing support for the Transmission Control Protocol. You’ll write a program called “webget” that creates a TCP stream socket, connects to a Web server, and fetches a page—much as you did earlier in this lab. In future labs, you’ll implement the other side of this abstraction, by implementing the Transmission Control Protocol yourself to create a reliable byte-stream out of not-so-reliable datagrams.
在本实验中,您将仅使用操作系统对传输控制协议的现有支持。您将编写一个名为“webget”的程序,该程序创建 TCP stream socket、连接到 Web 服务器并获取页面 - 就像您前面所做的一样。在未来的实验中,您将实现此抽象的另一面,通过自己实现传输控制协议来从不太可靠的数据报中创建可靠的字节流。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
| void get_URL( const string& host, const string& path )
{
const string& raw = "GET " + path + " HTTP/1.1\r\n" +
"Host: " + host + "\r\n" +
"Connection: close\r\n\r\n";
TCPSocket tcosocket{};
tcosocket.connect({host, "http"});
if (tcosocket.write(raw) != raw.length()) {
cerr << "write error\n";
}
while (!tcosocket.eof()) {
string rs;
tcosocket.read(rs);
cout << rs;
}
}
|
我这么写总感觉有些问题。
之前 raw
最后两个 \r\n
,我只有一个,每次都是 408 超时,后来再这样加一个换行就没事了,难绷。
To finish off this week’s lab, you will implement, in memory on a single computer, an object that provides this abstraction. (You may have done something similar in CS 110/111.) Bytes are written on the “input” side and can be read, in the same sequence, from the “output” side. The byte stream is finite: the writer can end the input, and then no more bytes can be written. When the reader has read to the end of the stream, it will reach “EOF” (end of file) and no more bytes can be read.
为了完成本周的实验,您将在一台计算机的内存中实现一个提供此抽象的对象。(您可能在 CS 110/111 中做过类似的事情。)字节在“输入”端写入,并可以按照相同的顺序从“输出”端读取。字节流是有限的:写入器可以结束输入,然后就不能再写入字节了。当读取器读到流的末尾时,它将到达“EOF”(文件末尾),并且不能再读取字节了。
首先在 byte_stream.hh 中多定义几个字段和函数,最后 ByteStream
类是这样:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
| class ByteStream
{
public:
explicit ByteStream( uint64_t capacity );
ByteStream& operator=(const ByteStream& val);
ByteStream(ByteStream& val);
ByteStream& operator=(ByteStream&& val) noexcept ;
ByteStream(ByteStream&& val) noexcept ;
// Helper functions (provided) to access the ByteStream's Reader and Writer interfaces
Reader& reader();
const Reader& reader() const;
Writer& writer();
const Writer& writer() const;
void set_error() { error_ = true; }; // Signal that the stream suffered an error.
bool has_error() const { return error_; }; // Has the stream had an error?
protected:
// Please add any additional state to the ByteStream here, and not to the Writer and Reader interfaces.
uint64_t capacity_;
uint64_t wcount_ {0};
uint64_t rcount_ {0};
std::deque<char> buffer_;
bool closeed_ {false};
bool error_ {};
};
|
这里特地加了复制移动那些函数,是因为测试用例需要用,要不是编译报错,我也没想到需要写(逃。
在 byte_stream.cc 中实现那些函数:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
| #include "byte_stream.hh"
#include <cstdint>
#include <string>
#include <string_view>
using namespace std;
ByteStream::ByteStream( uint64_t capacity ) : capacity_( capacity ) {}
ByteStream::ByteStream( ByteStream& val )
: capacity_( val.capacity_ )
, wcount_( val.wcount_ )
, rcount_( val.rcount_ )
, buffer_(val.buffer_)
, closeed_( val.closeed_ )
{}
ByteStream& ByteStream::operator=(const ByteStream& val) {
this->capacity_ = val.capacity_;
this->buffer_ = val.buffer_;
this->wcount_ = val.wcount_;
this->rcount_ = val.rcount_;
this->closeed_ = val.closeed_;
return *this;
}
ByteStream::ByteStream(ByteStream&& val ) noexcept
: capacity_( val.capacity_ )
, wcount_( val.wcount_ )
, rcount_( val.rcount_ )
, buffer_(std::move(val.buffer_))
, closeed_( val.closeed_ )
{}
ByteStream& ByteStream::operator=(ByteStream&& val) noexcept {
this->capacity_ =val.capacity_;
this->buffer_ = std::move(val.buffer_);
this->wcount_ = val.wcount_;
this->rcount_ = val.rcount_;
this->closeed_ = val.closeed_;
return *this;
}
bool Writer::is_closed() const
{
return closeed_;
}
void Writer::push( string data )
{
if (is_closed() || has_error()) {
return;
}
if (data.length() > available_capacity()) {
data.erase(available_capacity(), data.size() - available_capacity());
}
for (const auto& c : data) {
buffer_.emplace_back(c);
}
wcount_ += data.size();
}
void Writer::close()
{
closeed_ = true;
}
uint64_t Writer::available_capacity() const
{
return capacity_ - (wcount_ - rcount_);
}
uint64_t Writer::bytes_pushed() const
{
return wcount_;
}
bool Reader::is_finished() const
{
return closeed_ && (wcount_ == rcount_);
}
uint64_t Reader::bytes_popped() const
{
return rcount_;
}
string_view Reader::peek() const
{
return {&buffer_.front(), sizeof(char)};
}
void Reader::pop( uint64_t len )
{
buffer_.erase(buffer_.begin(), buffer_.begin() + len);
rcount_ += len;
}
uint64_t Reader::bytes_buffered() const
{
return wcount_ - rcount_;
}
|
push
的实现还是有些丑陋了,但我一时间也不知道怎么改了。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
| cmake --build build -j`nproc` --target check0
Test project /home/zuos/codPjt/Cpp/minnow/build
Connected to MAKE jobserver
Start 1: compile with bug-checkers
1/10 Test #1: compile with bug-checkers ........ Passed 0.19 sec
Start 2: t_webget
2/10 Test #2: t_webget ......................... Passed 1.07 sec
Start 3: byte_stream_basics
3/10 Test #3: byte_stream_basics ............... Passed 0.02 sec
Start 4: byte_stream_capacity
4/10 Test #4: byte_stream_capacity ............. Passed 0.01 sec
Start 5: byte_stream_one_write
5/10 Test #5: byte_stream_one_write ............ Passed 0.01 sec
Start 6: byte_stream_two_writes
6/10 Test #6: byte_stream_two_writes ........... Passed 0.01 sec
Start 7: byte_stream_many_writes
7/10 Test #7: byte_stream_many_writes .......... Passed 0.04 sec
Start 8: byte_stream_stress_test
8/10 Test #8: byte_stream_stress_test .......... Passed 0.20 sec
Start 37: compile with optimization
9/10 Test #37: compile with optimization ........ Passed 0.10 sec
Start 38: byte_stream_speed_test
ByteStream throughput: 0.69 Gbit/s
10/10 Test #38: byte_stream_speed_test ........... Passed 0.16 sec
100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 10
Total Test time (real) = 1.82 sec
Built target check0
|